Contact

If your system continues
when it shouldn't —

Contact us for a decision legitimacy assessment, a DASR mandate drift review, or a DriftBench evaluation. We work with organizations where execution control is not optional.

When to reach out

Your system continues under changing conditions

You cannot demonstrate that current operation still reflects the mandate under which the system was approved. Compliance passes. Legitimacy is unknown.

You need audit-grade mandate drift documentation

For regulatory, board-level, or internal governance purposes — a DASR review delivers Drift Magnitude, Velocity, and Cumulative Exposure as formal audit output.

You are deploying a high-risk AI system under EU AI Act

Article 9 and 17 require demonstrable legitimacy continuity. Decision Integrity provides the protocol layer that makes these requirements operationally enforceable.

You want to establish a decision legitimacy baseline

DriftBench runs a sealed evaluation against your model endpoint. No data leaves your environment. The fastest way to know where you stand.

Research collaboration or framework application

Academic or institutional engagement with Decision Integrity, DASR, GCCL, or the broader SnapOS framework stack.

Direct contact

Audit and governance inquiries

audit@snapos.org

For DASR reviews, DriftBench evaluations, mandate drift assessments, and decision architecture consulting.

Compliance-specific inquiries

compliance@snapos.org

For EU AI Act compliance, GCCL assessments, and regulated environment governance questions.

Address