For Regulators
Decision evidence, mandate continuity and witnessable governance claims.
SnapOS does not replace AI governance frameworks. It adds a decision-continuity layer for claims, workflows and evidence boundaries.
Regulatory relevance
Existing frameworks can define management systems, risk processes and documentation duties. SnapOS focuses on a narrower audit question: whether the final decision remains entitled to rely on the claim and evidence being used.
Mandate continuity
Has the authorization basis changed since approval?
Evidence boundary
Does the evidence still support the claim in the actual workflow?
Reopen triggers
Which change requires review, stop or renewed authorization?
Reliance statement
What may and may not be done with the finding?